Abstract
Should the constitution of a federation allow for peaceful secession? Constitutionally defined secession rules are optimal ex post if the federation breaks down. However, they may be suboptimal ex ante if the member countries receive a benefit from the perceived long-term stability of the federation and constitutionally defined secession rules increase the probability of a break-up. The optimal social contract trades off ex ante benefits and ex post losses, and it may avoid explicit secession rules. If transfers are costly, the trade-off is present even if ex post renegotiation is allowed. Finally, we show that under asymmetric information it is more difficult to keep the federation together and that a secession war may occur.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1811-1834 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | European Economic Review |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
Keywords
- Federalism
- Secession
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal secession rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver