Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimising radiographic bitewing examination to adultand juvenile patients through the use of anthropomorphic phantoms

  • Lawrence T. Dauer
  • , Iryna Branets
  • , Jeanine Stabulas-Savage
  • , Brian Quinn
  • , Daniel Miodownik
  • , Zachary L. Dauer
  • , Dan Colosi
  • , David Hershkowitz
  • , Arthur Goren
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • New York University
  • Messiah College
  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Four anthropomorphic phantoms (an adult male, an adult female, a 10-y-old child and a 5-y-old child) were exposed to bitewing radiographs at film and digital settings using both rectangular and round collimation. Optically stimulated dosemeters were used. For children, average organ doses were <40 mGy and the organs with the highest doses were the salivary glands, parotid, oral mucosa, skin and extrathoracic airway. For adults, average organ doses were <200 mGy. Highest adult doses were to the salivary glands, oral mucosa and skin. Effective doses ranged from 1.5 to 1.8 mSv for children and from 2.6 to 3.6 mSv for adults when optimised technique factors were employed, including digital receptors, rectangular collimation, size-appropriate exposure times and proper clinical judgment. Optimised doses were a fraction of the natural daily background exposure. Therefore, predictions of hypothetical cancer incidence or detriment in patient populations exposed to such low doses are highly speculative and should be discouraged.& copy The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbernct196
Pages (from-to)51-58
Number of pages8
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume158
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimising radiographic bitewing examination to adultand juvenile patients through the use of anthropomorphic phantoms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this