TY - JOUR
T1 - Peritonectomy procedures for peritoneal surface malignancies
T2 - PSOGI-ESGO-ISSPP Lyon consensus
AU - and PSOGI-ESGO-ISSPP Collaborators
AU - Bhatt, Aditi
AU - Stepanyan, Artem
AU - Moran, Brendan J.
AU - Chi, Dennis
AU - Fotopoulou, Christina
AU - Baumgartner, Joel M.
AU - Bakrin, Naoual
AU - Deraco, Marcello
AU - Ferron, Gwenael
AU - Kepenekian, Vahan
AU - Kusamura, Shigeki
AU - Lavoue, Vincent
AU - Al Niaimi, Ahmed
AU - Arjona-Sanchez, Alvaro
AU - Sehouli, Jalid
AU - Sukumar, Vivek
AU - Turaga, Kiran
AU - Villeneuve, Laurent
AU - Planchamp, François
AU - Zapardiel Gutiérrez, Ignacio
AU - Brennan, Donal J.
AU - Glehen, Olivier
AU - Martinez, Alejandra
AU - Heriot, Alexander
AU - Ben-Yaacov, Almog
AU - Di Giorgio, Andrea
AU - Brandl, Andreas
AU - Lowy, Andrew M.
AU - Fagotti, Anna
AU - Gil-Moreno, Antonio
AU - Sardi, Armando
AU - Saklani, Avanish
AU - Rau, Beate
AU - Badgwell, Brian
AU - Gomez, Carlos Martinez
AU - Grimm, Christoph
AU - Thompson, Claire
AU - Chia, Claramae
AU - Grisaru, Dan
AU - Baratti, Dario
AU - Guiral, Delia Cortés
AU - Barton, Desmond
AU - Damodaran, Dileep
AU - Haidopoulos, Dimitrios
AU - Tsolakidis, Dimitrios
AU - Levine, Edward
AU - Canbay, Emel
AU - Eveno, Clarisse
AU - Thangarajah, Fabinshy
AU - Abdel-Misih, Sherif
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Background The nomenclature and execution of peritonectomy procedures for peritoneal surface malignancies significantly vary between surgeons and centres. The aim of this consensus was to reach uniform nomenclature for peritonectomy procedures, to define subregions of each peritonectomy procedure, and to define boundaries of each subregion. Methods The modified Delphi technique was employed. A group of experts elaborated on the initial classification of six peritonectomy procedures. They added newer and ancillary peritonectomy procedures and defined boundaries of each procedure. Then a panel of surgeons with expertise in cytoreductive surgery voted on questions in two rounds. Consensus was reached if an option received >75% of the votes. Results Of 112 surgeons invited, 107 (95.5%) and 101 (90.1%) voted in round I and round II respectively. Consensus was reached on 207 of 211 questions (98.1%), including all of the questions related to the subdivisions of peritonectomy procedures and the boundaries of each peritonectomy procedure. The four questions on which consensus was not reached were related to the 'most appropriate term' for specific peritonectomy procedures. A reporting form was devised to document the extent of peritonectomy. Conclusion This consensus successfully devised a revised nomenclature for peritonectomy procedures. The reporting format is an important tool for research on the extent of peritoneal resection required for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.
AB - Background The nomenclature and execution of peritonectomy procedures for peritoneal surface malignancies significantly vary between surgeons and centres. The aim of this consensus was to reach uniform nomenclature for peritonectomy procedures, to define subregions of each peritonectomy procedure, and to define boundaries of each subregion. Methods The modified Delphi technique was employed. A group of experts elaborated on the initial classification of six peritonectomy procedures. They added newer and ancillary peritonectomy procedures and defined boundaries of each procedure. Then a panel of surgeons with expertise in cytoreductive surgery voted on questions in two rounds. Consensus was reached if an option received >75% of the votes. Results Of 112 surgeons invited, 107 (95.5%) and 101 (90.1%) voted in round I and round II respectively. Consensus was reached on 207 of 211 questions (98.1%), including all of the questions related to the subdivisions of peritonectomy procedures and the boundaries of each peritonectomy procedure. The four questions on which consensus was not reached were related to the 'most appropriate term' for specific peritonectomy procedures. A reporting form was devised to document the extent of peritonectomy. Conclusion This consensus successfully devised a revised nomenclature for peritonectomy procedures. The reporting format is an important tool for research on the extent of peritoneal resection required for treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009028322
U2 - 10.1093/bjs/znaf112
DO - 10.1093/bjs/znaf112
M3 - Article
C2 - 40560098
AN - SCOPUS:105009028322
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 112
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 6
M1 - znaf112
ER -