Persistent Memory Research in the Post-Optane Era

After over a decade of researcher anticipation for the arrival of persistent memory (PMem), the first shipments of 3D XPoint-based Intel Optane Memory in 2019 were quickly followed by its cancellation in 2022. Was this another case of an idea quickly fading from future to past tense, relegating work in this area to the graveyard of failed technologies?The recently introduced Compute Express Link (CXL) may offer a path forward, with its persistent memory profile offering a universal PMem attachment point. Yet new technologies for memory-speed persistence seem years off, and may never become competitive with evolving DRAM and flash speeds. Without persistent memory itself, is future PMem research doomed? We offer two arguments for why reports of the death of PMem research are greatly exaggerated.First, the bulk of persistent-memory research has not in fact addressed memory persistence, but rather in-memory crash consistency, which was never an issue in prior systems where CPUs could not observe post-crash memory states. CXL memory pooling allows multiple hosts to share a single memory, all in different failure domains, raising crash-consistency issues even with volatile memory.Second, we believe CXL necessitates a "disaggregation"of PMem research. Most work to date assumed a single technology and set of features, i.e., speed, byte addressability, and CPU load/store access. With an open interface allowing new topologies and diverse PMem technologies, we argue for the need to examine these features individually and in combination.While one form of PMem may have been canceled, we argue that the research problems it raised not only remain relevant but have expanded in a CXL-based future.