Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Personality Change Across Four Years in World Trade Center Responders

  • Stony Brook University
  • Southern Methodist University
  • University of North Texas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigated personality change over the course of a four-year longitudinal study in N = 452 older adults who responded to the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center (Mage = 55 years, SD = 0.41). This sample provides the rare opportunity to compare normative findings of personality change with change in a unique group with a common trauma. Participants completed the Faceted Inventory of the Five-Factor Model and the Big Five Inventory-2 across four years. Latent growth modeling showed significant mean-level decreases in Openness and Extraversion. At the facet-level, significant decreases were found for Aesthetic Sensitivity, Creative Imagination, Intellectual Curiosity, Anxiety, Anger Proneness, Positive Temperament, Venturesomeness, Ascendence, Empathy, and Achievement Striving. Further, responders showed variability in change—in particular, for Neuroticism and its facets. Regressions from exposure level and age on personality change were also examined. Results highlight the importance of facet-level analysis, as significant change was found only for certain facets within domains—sometimes when the domains showed no change. Differences between responders and normative comparisons were examined. Responders share unique trauma and personality findings may allow clinically useful information on the mental-health problems that responders experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-335
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • Personality change
  • big five
  • longitudinal
  • responders
  • world-trade-center

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personality Change Across Four Years in World Trade Center Responders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this