Abstract
Background: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS) has been proposed as an ovarian cancer risk-reducing strategy. Methods: A survey was emailed to 300 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Results: 125 (42%) surveys were returned: 60% female, 88% generalists, 67% private practice. Only 36% correctly identified the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer, only 23% understood the risk-reducing benefit of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. 75% perform salpingectomy during hysterectomy, 26–53% use for sterilization depending on approach. Concerns were increased operative time and complications. For BRCA mutations, 64% recommend BSO, 12% recommend a two-step risk-reducing strategy, and 14% refer to gynecologic oncology. Conclusions: We identified broad support and factors limiting willingness to perform OBS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-61 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Cancer Investigation |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2 2017 |
Keywords
- Ovarian cancer prevention
- practice patterns
- risk-reducing surgery
- salpingectomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Physicians' Perspectives and Practice Patterns Toward Opportunistic Salpingectomy in High- and Low-Risk Women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver