Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Piled Modifiers, Buried Verbs, and Other Turgid Prose in the American Political Science Review

  • Harvard University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Academic writing is notoriously difficult to read. Can political science do better' To assess the state of prose in political science, we examined a recent issue of the American Political Science Review. We evaluated the articles according to the basic principles of style endorsed by writing experts. We find that the writing suffers most from heavy noun phrases in forms such as noun noun noun and adjective adjective noun noun. Further, we describe five contributors that swell noun phrases: piled modifiers, needless words, nebulous nouns, missing prepositions, and buried verbs. We document more than a thousand examples and demonstrate how to revise each one with principles of style. We also draw on research in cognitive science to explain why these constructions confuse, mislead, and distract readers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-128
Number of pages6
JournalPS - Political Science and Politics
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 18 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Piled Modifiers, Buried Verbs, and Other Turgid Prose in the American Political Science Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this