Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Population description and clinical response assessment for spinal metastases: Part 2 of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group report

  • Ilya Laufer
  • , Simon S. Lo
  • , Eric L. Chang
  • , Jason Sheehan
  • , Matthias Guckenberger
  • , Moon Jun Sohn
  • , Samuel Ryu
  • , Matthew Foote
  • , Alexander Muacevic
  • , Scott G. Soltys
  • , Samuel Chao
  • , Sten Myrehaug
  • , Peter C. Gerszten
  • , Eric Lis
  • , Pejman Maralani
  • , Mark Bilsky
  • , Charles Fisher
  • , Laurence Rhines
  • , Jorrit Jan Verlaan
  • , David Schiff
  • Michael G. Fehlings, Lijun Ma, Susan Chang, Wendy R. Parulekar, Michael A. Vogelbaum, Arjun Sahgal
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Washington
  • University of Southern California
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Zurich
  • Inje University
  • University of Queensland
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Stanford University
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Canadian Cancer Trials Group
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Toronto
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Utrecht University
  • TorontoWestern Hospital
  • University of California at San Francisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Approximately 40% of metastatic cancer patients will develop spinal metastases. The current report provides recommendations for standardization of metrics used for spinal oncology patient population description and outcome assessment beyond local control endpoints on behalf of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group. Methods. The SPINO group survey was conducted in order to determine the preferences for utilization of clinician-based and patient-reported outcome measures for description of patients with spinal metastases. Subsequently, ClinicalTrials.gov registry was searched for spinal oncology clinical trials, and measures for patient description and outcome reporting were identified for each trial. These two searches were used to identify currently used descriptors and instruments. A literature search was performed focusing on the measures identified in the survey and clinical trial search in order to assess their validity in the metastatic spinal tumor patient population. References for this manuscript were identified through PubMed and Medline searches. Results. Published literature, expert survey, and ongoing clinical trials were used to synthesize recommendations for instruments for reporting of spinal stability, epidural tumor extension, neurological and functional status, and symptom severity. Conclusions. Accurate description of patient population and therapy effects requires a combination of clinician-based and patient-reported outcome measures. The current report provides international consensus recommendations for the systematic reporting of patient- and clinician-reported measures required to develop trials applicable to surgery for spinal metastases and postoperative spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1215-1224
Number of pages10
JournalNeuro-Oncology
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2 2018

Keywords

  • Metastases
  • Response assessment
  • SPINO
  • Spine radiosurgery
  • Spine surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Population description and clinical response assessment for spinal metastases: Part 2 of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group report'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this