TY - GEN
T1 - Power Resilience Assessment from Physical and Socio-Demographic Perspectives
AU - Ulak, Mehmet Baran
AU - Yazici, Anil
AU - Ozguven, Eren Erman
AU - Vanli, Arda
AU - Arghandeh, Reza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Urban resilience is a multifaceted concept including the recovery of the physical infrastructure and various urban activities that depend on that physical infrastructure. It is relatively straightforward to quantify infrastructure resilience by tracking the recovered facilities in time and marking the time that the infrastructure is fully functioning again. However, the physical infrastructure recovery does not necessarily indicate that the urban activities bounce back to the predisaster conditions. The restoration of urban activities depends on the areas that a particular infrastructure serves (e.g., residential, commercial) and the connections with other critical facilities (e.g., health, education). It is important to investigate the infrastructure recovery and 'resilience divide' with respect to the enabled services and affected populations in order to achieve all-inclusive resilience. For this purpose, we examined the resilience of different physical elements such as power feeders (i.e., underground or overhead lines), critical facilities (e.g., fire and rescue services, hospitals) and different socio-demographic segments of the population (i.e., different age groups, ethnicities, and income levels) which constitute an urban environment. The analyses were conducted using the power outages experienced after Hurricane Hermine in Tallahassee, as a case study. The findings show that overall resilience performance can be distinct and/or not homogeneous for the resilience of different physical elements, urban services, and population groups.
AB - Urban resilience is a multifaceted concept including the recovery of the physical infrastructure and various urban activities that depend on that physical infrastructure. It is relatively straightforward to quantify infrastructure resilience by tracking the recovered facilities in time and marking the time that the infrastructure is fully functioning again. However, the physical infrastructure recovery does not necessarily indicate that the urban activities bounce back to the predisaster conditions. The restoration of urban activities depends on the areas that a particular infrastructure serves (e.g., residential, commercial) and the connections with other critical facilities (e.g., health, education). It is important to investigate the infrastructure recovery and 'resilience divide' with respect to the enabled services and affected populations in order to achieve all-inclusive resilience. For this purpose, we examined the resilience of different physical elements such as power feeders (i.e., underground or overhead lines), critical facilities (e.g., fire and rescue services, hospitals) and different socio-demographic segments of the population (i.e., different age groups, ethnicities, and income levels) which constitute an urban environment. The analyses were conducted using the power outages experienced after Hurricane Hermine in Tallahassee, as a case study. The findings show that overall resilience performance can be distinct and/or not homogeneous for the resilience of different physical elements, urban services, and population groups.
KW - Critical facilities
KW - Infrastructure electric grid
KW - Resilience
KW - Socio-demographic groups
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85080111169
U2 - 10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987673
DO - 10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987673
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85080111169
T3 - 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety, ICSRS 2019
SP - 421
EP - 428
BT - 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety, ICSRS 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety, ICSRS 2019
Y2 - 20 November 2019 through 22 November 2019
ER -