Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictors of Nonhome Discharge after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC

  • Boateng Kubi
  • , Jonathan Gunn
  • , Nadege Fackche
  • , Jordan M. Cloyd
  • , Sherif Abdel-Misih
  • , Travis Grotz
  • , Jennifer Leiting
  • , Keith Fournier
  • , Andrew J. Lee
  • , Sean Dineen
  • , Sophie Dessureault
  • , Jula Veerapong
  • , Joel M. Baumgartner
  • , Callisia Clarke
  • , Harveshp Mogal
  • , Sameer H. Patel
  • , Vikrom Dhar
  • , Laura Lambert
  • , Ryan J. Hendrix
  • , Daniel E. Abbott
  • Courtney Pokrzywa, Mustafa Raoof, Byrne Lee, Shishir K. Maithel, Charles A. Staley, Fabian M. Johnston, Nae Yuh Wang, Jonathan B. Greer
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Ohio State University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • Emory University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Using a national database of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) recipients, we sought to determine risk factors for nonhome discharge (NHD) in a cohort of patients. Methods: Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC at any one of 12 participating sites between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Univariate analysis was used to compare the characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications of patients discharged home and patients with NHD. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors of NHD. Results: The cohort included 1593 patients, of which 70 (4.4%) had an NHD. The median [range] peritoneal cancer index in our cohort was 14 [0-39]. Significant predictors of NHD identified in our regression analysis were advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < 0.001), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 4 (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.21-6.83; P = 0.017), appendiceal histology (OR, 3.14; 95% CI 1.57-6.28; P = 0.001), smoking history (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.70-6.12; P < 0.001), postoperative total parenteral nutrition (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.70-5.81; P < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR, 7.40; 95% CI, 3.36-16.31; P < 0.001), wound site infections (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.58-6.17; P = 0.001), preoperative hemoglobin (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006), and total number of complications (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16-1.73; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Early identification of patients at high risk for NHD after CRS/HIPEC is key for preoperative and postoperative counseling and resource allocation, as well as minimizing hospital-acquired conditions and associated health care costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-485
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume255
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Cytoreductive surgery
  • Destination
  • Discharge
  • HIPEC
  • Rehab
  • Value-based

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of Nonhome Discharge after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this