Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Psychosis superspectrum II: neurobiology, treatment, and implications

  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • University of North Texas
  • Zucker Hillside Hospital
  • Hofstra North Shore-Long Island Jewish School of Medicine
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Alternatives to traditional categorical diagnoses have been proposed to improve the validity and utility of psychiatric nosology. This paper continues the companion review of an alternative model, the psychosis superspectrum of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). The superspectrum model aims to describe psychosis-related psychopathology according to data on distributions and associations among signs and symptoms. The superspectrum includes psychoticism and detachment spectra as well as narrow subdimensions within them. Auxiliary domains of cognitive deficit and functional impairment complete the psychopathology profile. The current paper reviews evidence on this model from neurobiology, treatment response, clinical utility, and measure development. Neurobiology research suggests that psychopathology included in the superspectrum shows similar patterns of neural alterations. Treatment response often mirrors the hierarchy of the superspectrum with some treatments being efficacious for psychoticism, others for detachment, and others for a specific subdimension. Compared to traditional diagnostic systems, the quantitative nosology shows an approximately 2-fold increase in reliability, explanatory power, and prognostic accuracy. Clinicians consistently report that the quantitative nosology has more utility than traditional diagnoses, but studies of patients with frank psychosis are currently lacking. Validated measures are available to implement the superspectrum model in practice. The dimensional conceptualization of psychosis-related psychopathology has implications for research, clinical practice, and public health programs. For example, it encourages use of the cohort study design (rather than case-control), transdiagnostic treatment strategies, and selective prevention based on subclinical symptoms. These approaches are already used in the field, and the superspectrum provides further impetus and guidance for their implementation. Existing knowledge on this model is substantial, but significant gaps remain. We identify outstanding questions and propose testable hypotheses to guide further research. Overall, we predict that the more informative, reliable, and valid characterization of psychopathology offered by the superspectrum model will facilitate progress in research and clinical care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1293-1309
Number of pages17
JournalMolecular Psychiatry
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychosis superspectrum II: neurobiology, treatment, and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this