Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Publication Recommendations to Report Laboratory Data of Neonates – a Modified Delphi Approach

  • On behalf of the International Neonatal Consortium*
  • KU Leuven
  • Bayer AG
  • International Neonatal Consortium
  • Critical Path Institute
  • University of Utah
  • Stanford University
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Inc. (COINN)
  • College of New Jersey
  • Alliance for Black NICU Families
  • National Center for Child Health and Development
  • Georgetown Dermatology
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • University of Liverpool
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Kyorin University
  • Neonatal Research Network of Japan
  • Maternal Infant Child and Youth Research Network (Vancouver, BC)
  • University of Calgary
  • Pediatrix Medical Group of TN/National Association of Neonatal Nurses
  • Pediatrix Medical Group of TN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Clinical and analytical information on laboratory data of neonates in scientific publications is sparse and incomplete. Furthermore, interpreting neonatal laboratory data can be complex due to their time-dependent and developmental physiology, and paucity of well-established age-appropriate reference ranges for neonates. This study aims to develop publication recommendations to report laboratory data of neonates to enhance the quality of these data in research and clinical care. Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used to develop recommendations in cooperation with the International Neonatal Consortium. A Core Group, including different stakeholders, was responsible for developing the recommendations, in collaboration with a Reflection Group, responsible for providing additional input. Results: The recommendations were classified into three categories: ‘Clinical Characteristics’, ‘Bio-analytical Information’ and ‘Data-analytical Information’. These were each divided into ‘Core Data’ (always to be reported) and ‘Supplemental Considerations’ (to be reported when considered relevant to the study). Conclusion: Our recommendations provide guidance on standardization of neonatal laboratory data in publications. This will enhance the comparison, replication, and application of study results in research initiatives and clinical practice. Furthermore, these recommendations also serve as foundational work to develop reference ranges for neonatal laboratory values by standardizing the quality of information needed for such efforts. Impact: Standardized reporting of neonatal laboratory data in scientific publications will enhance the comparison, replication, and application of study results in research initiatives and clinical practice, as well as improve reporting to regulatory agencies. To integrate multistakeholder perspectives, a modified Delphi approach was used to develop publication recommendations which strengthens the applicability of the recommendations. Implementation of standardization will likely improve the overall quality of neonatal clinical research and neonatal healthcare. In addition, these recommendations are foundational to develop reference ranges for neonatal laboratory values by standardizing the quality of information needed for such efforts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-88
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Research
Volume96
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Publication Recommendations to Report Laboratory Data of Neonates – a Modified Delphi Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this