Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species

  • H. Resit Akçakaya
  • , Elizabeth L. Bennett
  • , Thomas M. Brooks
  • , Molly K. Grace
  • , Anna Heath
  • , Simon Hedges
  • , Craig Hilton-Taylor
  • , Michael Hoffmann
  • , David A. Keith
  • , Barney Long
  • , David P. Mallon
  • , Erik Meijaard
  • , E. J. Milner-Gulland
  • , Ana S.L. Rodrigues
  • , Jon Paul Rodriguez
  • , P. J. Stephenson
  • , Simon N. Stuart
  • , Richard P. Young
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • University of the Philippines
  • University of Tasmania
  • University of Oxford
  • Synchronicity Earth
  • IUCN SSC Asian Elephant and Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group
  • IUCN Red List Unit
  • IUCN Species Survival Commission
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • University of New South Wales
  • NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment
  • Global Wildlife Conservation
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group
  • IUCN SSC Wild Pig Specialist Group
  • University of Queensland
  • Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive
  • Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • IUCN SSC Species Monitoring Specialist Group
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

203 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stopping declines in biodiversity is critically important, but it is only a first step toward achieving more ambitious conservation goals. The absence of an objective and practical definition of species recovery that is applicable across taxonomic groups leads to inconsistent targets in recovery plans and frustrates reporting and maximization of conservation impact. We devised a framework for comprehensively assessing species recovery and conservation success. We propose a definition of a fully recovered species that emphasizes viability, ecological functionality, and representation; and use counterfactual approaches to quantify degree of recovery. This allowed us to calculate a set of 4 conservation metrics that demonstrate impacts of conservation efforts to date (conservation legacy); identify dependence of a species on conservation actions (conservation dependence); quantify expected gains resulting from conservation action in the medium term (conservation gain); and specify requirements to achieve maximum plausible recovery over the long term (recovery potential). These metrics can incentivize the establishment and achievement of ambitious conservation targets. We illustrate their use by applying the framework to a vertebrate, an invertebrate, and a woody and an herbaceous plant. Our approach is a preliminary framework for an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green List of Species, which was mandated by a resolution of IUCN members in 2012. Although there are several challenges in applying our proposed framework to a wide range of species, we believe its further development, implementation, and integration with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species will help catalyze a positive and ambitious vision for conservation that will drive sustained conservation action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1128-1138
Number of pages11
JournalConservation Biology
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Saiga tatarica
  • Saiga tatarica
  • conservation impact
  • conservation optimism
  • especies amenazadas
  • especies recuperadas
  • impacto de la conservación
  • listas rojas
  • optimismo de conservación
  • recovered species
  • red lists
  • threatened species

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN Green List of Species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this