Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods

  • W. C. Burnett
  • , P. K. Aggarwal
  • , A. Aureli
  • , H. Bokuniewicz
  • , J. E. Cable
  • , M. A. Charette
  • , E. Kontar
  • , S. Krupa
  • , K. M. Kulkarni
  • , A. Loveless
  • , W. S. Moore
  • , J. A. Oberdorfer
  • , J. Oliveira
  • , N. Ozyurt
  • , P. Povinec
  • , A. M.G. Privitera
  • , R. Rajar
  • , R. T. Ramessur
  • , J. Scholten
  • , T. Stieglitz
  • M. Taniguchi, J. V. Turner
  • Florida State University
  • International Atomic Energy Agency
  • University of Palermo
  • Louisiana State University
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • Shirshov Institute of Oceanology
  • Florida Department of Environmental Protection
  • University of Western Australia
  • University of South Carolina
  • San Jose State University
  • Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares
  • Hacettepe University
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • University of Ljubljana
  • University of Mauritius
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • Australian Institute of Marine Science
  • National Institutes for the Humanities, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
  • CSIRO

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

867 Scopus citations

Abstract

Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is now recognized as an important pathway between land and sea. As such, this flow may contribute to the biogeochemical and other marine budgets of near-shore waters. These discharges typically display significant spatial and temporal variability making assessments difficult. Groundwater seepage is patchy, diffuse, temporally variable, and may involve multiple aquifers. Thus, the measurement of its magnitude and associated chemical fluxes is a challenging enterprise. A joint project of UNESCO and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has examined several methods of SGD assessment and carried out a series of five intercomparison experiments in different hydrogeologic environments (coastal plain, karst, glacial till, fractured crystalline rock, and volcanic terrains). This report reviews the scientific and management significance of SGD, measurement approaches, and the results of the intercomparison experiments. We conclude that while the process is essentially ubiquitous in coastal areas, the assessment of its magnitude at any one location is subject to enough variability that measurements should be made by a variety of techniques and over large enough spatial and temporal scales to capture the majority of these changing conditions. We feel that all the measurement techniques described here are valid although they each have their own advantages and disadvantages. It is recommended that multiple approaches be applied whenever possible. In addition, a continuing effort is required in order to capture long-period tidal fluctuations, storm effects, and seasonal variations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-543
Number of pages46
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume367
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 31 2006

Keywords

  • Coastal zone management
  • Radium isotopes
  • Radon
  • Seepage meters
  • Submarine groundwater discharge
  • Tracers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this