Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Nomenclature

  • James N. Kirkpatrick
  • , Nova Panebianco
  • , José L. Díaz-Gómez
  • , Srikar Adhikari
  • , Merri L. Bremer
  • , Yuriy S. Bronshteyn
  • , Sara Damewood
  • , Madeline Jankowski
  • , Amer Johri
  • , Judith R.H. Kaplan
  • , Bruce J. Kimura
  • , Smadar Kort
  • , Arthur Labovitz
  • , Jimmy C. Lu
  • , Irene W.Y. Ma
  • , Paul H. Mayo
  • , Sharon L. Mulvagh
  • , Sara Nikravan
  • , Sheela Pai Cole
  • , Michael H. Picard
  • Vincent L. Sorrell, Raymond Stainback, Ritu Thamman, Edwin S. Tucay, Gabriele Via, Frances Mae West
  • University of Washington
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi
  • University of Arizona
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Duke University
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Northwestern University
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Science History Institute
  • Scripps Mercy Hospital
  • NCH Rooney Heart Institute
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Calgary
  • Hofstra North Shore-Long Island Jewish School of Medicine
  • Dalhousie University
  • Stanford University
  • Harvard University
  • University of Kentucky
  • Baylor University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Philippine Heart Center
  • Cardiocentro Ticino Foundation
  • Thomas Jefferson University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) involves the acquisition, interpretation, and immediate clinical integration of ultrasonographic imaging performed by a treating clinician. The current state of cardiac POCUS terminology is heterogeneous and ambiguous, in part because it evolved through siloed specialty practices. In particular, the medical literature and colloquial medical conversation contain a wide variety of terms that equate to cardiac POCUS. While diverse terminology aided in the development and dissemination of cardiac POCUS throughout multiple specialties, it also contributes to confusion and raises patient safety concerns. This statement is the product of a diverse and inclusive Writing Group from multiple specialties, including medical linguistics, that employed an iterative process to contextualize and standardize a nomenclature for cardiac POCUS. We sought to establish a deliberate vocabulary that is sufficiently unrelated to any specialty, ultrasound equipment, or clinical setting to enhance consistency throughout the academic literature and patient care settings. This statement (1) reviews the evolution of cardiac POCUS-related terms; (2) outlines specific recommendations, distinguishing between intrinsic and practical differences in terminology; (3) addresses the implications of these recommendations for current practice; and (4) discusses the implications for novel technologies and future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)809-819
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • Cardiac
  • Echocardiography
  • Point-of-care ultrasound
  • Terminology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Nomenclature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this