Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Registration practices for observational studies on ClinicalTrials.gov indicated low adherence

  • Stefania Boccia
  • , Kenneth J. Rothman
  • , Nikola Panic
  • , Maria Elena Flacco
  • , Annalisa Rosso
  • , Roberta Pastorino
  • , Lamberto Manzoli
  • , Carlo La Vecchia
  • , Paolo Villari
  • , Paolo Boffetta
  • , Walter Ricciardi
  • , John P.A. Ioannidis
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • RTI International
  • Boston University
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • ASL Pescara
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • CeSI Biotech
  • University of Milan
  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective The study aims to assess the status of registration of observational studies. Study Design and Setting We identified studies on cancer research with prospective recruitment of participants that were registered from February 2000 to December 2011 in ClinicalTrials.gov. We recorded the dates of registration and start of recruitment, outcomes, and description of statistical method. We searched for publications corresponding to the registered studies through May 31, 2014. Results One thousand one hundred nine registered studies were eligible. Primary and secondary outcomes were reported in 809 (73.0%) and 464 (41.8%) of them. The date of registration preceded the month of the study start in 145 (13.8%) and coincided in 205 (19.5%). A total of 151 publications from 120 (10.8%) registered studies were identified. In 2 (33.3%) of the 6 publications where ClinicalTrials.gov reported that the study started recruitment after registration, and in 9 (50.0%) of 18 publications where ClinicalTrials.gov reported the same date for registration and start of recruitment, the articles showed that the study had actually started recruiting before registration. Conclusion During the period reviewed, few observational studies have been registered. Registration usually occurred after the study started, and prespecification of outcomes and statistical analysis rarely occurred.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-182
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume70
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Keywords

  • Cancer protocol registration
  • ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Outcome reporting bias
  • Protocol registration
  • Registration of observational studies
  • Registration study records

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Registration practices for observational studies on ClinicalTrials.gov indicated low adherence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this