Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Dimensioning of Cloud Caches: A Restless Bandit Approach

  • Guojun Xiong
  • , Shufan Wang
  • , Gang Yan
  • , Jian Li
  • State University of New York Binghamton University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

We study the dynamic cache dimensioning problem, where the objective is to decide how much storage to place in the cache to minimize the total costs with respect to the storage and content delivery latency. We formulate this problem as a Markov decision process, which turns out to be a restless multi-armed bandit problem and is provably hard to solve. For given dimensioning decisions, it is possible to develop solutions based on the celebrated Whittle index policy. However, Whittle index policy has not been studied for dynamic cache dimensioning, mainly because cache dimensioning needs to be repeatedly solved and jointly optimized with content caching. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a low-complexity fluid Whittle index policy, which jointly determines dimensioning and content caching. We show that this policy is asymptotically optimal. We further develop a lightweight reinforcement learning augmented algorithm dubbed fW-UCB when the content request and delivery rates are unavailable. fW-UCB is shown to achieve a sub-linear regret as it fully exploits the structure of the near-optimal fluid Whittle index policy and hence can be easily implemented. Extensive simulations using real traces support our theoretical results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2147-2161
Number of pages15
JournalIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2023

Keywords

  • Cloud cache dimensioning
  • index policy
  • reinforcement learning
  • restless bandits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Dimensioning of Cloud Caches: A Restless Bandit Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this