Reply to Editorial Comment on “Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis”

Michael Hung; Jim C. Hu

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis”

Michael Hung
, Jim C. Hu

Urology

New York Presbyterian Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	100
Number of pages	1
Journal	Urology
Volume	186
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001
State	Published - Apr 2024

Access to Document

10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001

Cite this

@article{ee835ae51308445f8dbc8b28f9f08215,

title = "Reply to Editorial Comment on “Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis”",

author = "Michael Hung and Hu, \{Jim C.\}",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001",

language = "English",

volume = "186",

pages = "100",

journal = "Urology",

issn = "0090-4295",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Editorial Comment on “Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

T2 - Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis”

AU - Hung, Michael

AU - Hu, Jim C.

PY - 2024/4

Y1 - 2024/4

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85188473437

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2024.01.001

M3 - Letter

C2 - 38336131

AN - SCOPUS:85188473437

SN - 0090-4295

VL - 186

SP - 100

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

ER -

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis”

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this