TY - GEN
T1 - Resolving the discrepancy between observed and calculated penetration depths in grazing incidence X-ray topography of 4H-SiC wafers
AU - Yang, Yu
AU - Guo, Jianqiu
AU - Raghothamachar, Balaji
AU - Dudley, Michael
AU - Chung, Gill
AU - Sanchez, Edward
AU - Manning, Ian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Synchrotron X-ray Topography with grazing incidence geometry is useful for discerning defects at different depths below the crystal surface, particularly for 4H-SiC epitaxial wafers. However, the penetration depths measured from X-ray topographs are much larger than the theoretical values. In order to interpret this discrepancy, we simulate topographic contrast of dislocations based on two of the most basic contrast formation mechanisms – orientation contrast and kinematical contrast. Orientation contrast considers merely the displacement fields associated with dislocations while kinematical contrast also takes the diffraction volume into account. The diffraction volume is defined by the effective misorientation around dislocations and the rocking curve width for particular diffraction vector. Ray Tracing Simulation has been carried out to visualize dislocation contrast for both models, taking into account the photoelectric absorption of X-ray beams inside the crystal. Results show that orientation contrast plays the key role in determining both the contrast and X-ray penetration depths for different types of dislocations.
AB - Synchrotron X-ray Topography with grazing incidence geometry is useful for discerning defects at different depths below the crystal surface, particularly for 4H-SiC epitaxial wafers. However, the penetration depths measured from X-ray topographs are much larger than the theoretical values. In order to interpret this discrepancy, we simulate topographic contrast of dislocations based on two of the most basic contrast formation mechanisms – orientation contrast and kinematical contrast. Orientation contrast considers merely the displacement fields associated with dislocations while kinematical contrast also takes the diffraction volume into account. The diffraction volume is defined by the effective misorientation around dislocations and the rocking curve width for particular diffraction vector. Ray Tracing Simulation has been carried out to visualize dislocation contrast for both models, taking into account the photoelectric absorption of X-ray beams inside the crystal. Results show that orientation contrast plays the key role in determining both the contrast and X-ray penetration depths for different types of dislocations.
KW - Grazing incidence
KW - Kinematical diffraction
KW - Orientation contrast
KW - Penetration depth
KW - Synchrotron X-ray Topography
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020002106
U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.897.209
DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.897.209
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85020002106
SN - 9783035710434
T3 - Materials Science Forum
SP - 209
EP - 213
BT - Silicon Carbide and Related Materials 2016
A2 - Zekentes, Konstantinos
A2 - Zekentes, Konstantinos
A2 - Vasilevskiy, Konstantin V.
A2 - Frangis, Nikolaos
PB - Trans Tech Publications Ltd
T2 - 11th European Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, ECSCRM 2016
Y2 - 25 September 2016 through 29 September 2016
ER -