Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reversal of Head and Neck Cancer Risk after the Cessation of Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Betel Quid Use: Meta-Analysis

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Bologna

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The use of smokeless tobacco and betel quid is a significant risk factor for head and neck cancer, posing a major global public health concern. This meta-analysis evaluates the impact of cessation of the use of these products on head and neck cancer risk to guide interventions. Case-control and cohort studies were found through PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. Two independent reviewers screened studies and then extracted data. RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for different product cessation were calculated from raw data and meta-analyzed by using random-effects models. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were predominantly derived from Asian (n = 9) studies in which betel quid use is widespread. Results showed reduced head and neck cancer risk following cessation of betel quid use with (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81) or without tobacco (RR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). However, other tobacco chewing products showed an RR of 1.07 (95% CI, 0.75-1.53). Long-term cessation (≥20 years) conferred substantial benefits (RR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.61; risk estimates = 4). The study highlights the importance of cessation programs and targeted interventions to encourage smokeless tobacco quitting. Future research includes conducting detailed subgroup analyses based on cancer subsites and smokeless tobacco product types.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-626
Number of pages8
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reversal of Head and Neck Cancer Risk after the Cessation of Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Betel Quid Use: Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this