Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Revised Process for ACNS Guidelines Development

  • Imran H. Quraishi
  • , Edgard Andrade
  • , Gloria Galloway
  • , Ann Hyslop
  • , Olga Selioutski
  • , Saurabh Sinha
  • , Susan T. Arnold
  • , Ravindra Arya
  • , Anto I. Bagić
  • , Frank Drislane
  • , David Gloss
  • , Abeer J. Hani
  • , Eliane Kobayashi
  • , Ahmad Marashly
  • , Mark R. Nuwer
  • , Jun Park
  • , Dragos Sabau
  • , Daniel San-Juan
  • , Asim Shahid
  • , Karen Skjei
  • William O. Tatum, Michael Vengrow, Courtney J. Wusthoff
  • Yale University
  • University of Florida
  • Ohio State University
  • Stanford University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • The Neuromedical Center
  • Lebanese American University
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia
  • Cornell University
  • El Paso Center for Seizures and Epilepsy
  • Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida
  • P.A.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The development of clinical practice guidelines is an evolving field. In response to the need for consistent, evidence-based medical practice, the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society identified the need to update the Society's guideline development process. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guidelines Committee created an action plan with the goal of improving transparency and rigor for future guidelines and bringing existing guidelines to current standards. This article provides an overview of the new American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standards for the creation of clinical guidance documents, including clinical guidelines, technical standards, and consensus statements. This process is rooted in the importance of clinical guidance documents and their significance in the context of current behests for updated standards for practicing clinical neurophysiology. The need and rationale for updating the guideline development process from its prior state were described. The updated American Clinical Neurophysiology Society categories for clinical guidance and recommendations were defined and compared. Finally, the new process is summarized, focusing on methodologies, authorship, and conflicts of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-100
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2025

Keywords

  • Clinical neurophysiology
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Consensus statements
  • Guideline methodology
  • Technical standards

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revised Process for ACNS Guidelines Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this