Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk Factors and Real-World Short-Term Outcomes of a Failed Trial of Void after Rezum Therapy in a Multiethnic Population

  • Mustufa Babar
  • , Kevin Labagnara
  • , Justin Loloi
  • , Kevin Tang
  • , Matthew Ines
  • , Sandeep Singh
  • , Nazifa Iqbal
  • , Michael Ciatto
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • DSS Urology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication following surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We aimed to identify risk factors for a failed trial of void (TOV) following treatment with the Rezum system and assess the impact of a failed TOV on short-Term outcomes. Methods: A single-office retrospective study was conducted on patients treated with Rezum therapy between 2017 and 2019. A urinary catheter was placed in all patients following Rezum therapy. Demographic data and outcome measures, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), and adverse events, were analyzed at baseline and 1, 3, and/or 6 months postoperatively. Risk factors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 289 patients were included. Thirty-five patients (12.1%) failed a TOV, while 254 (87.9%) had an effective TOV. All patients were given a TOV after a median of 5 days (4-5). Those who failed the TOV spent an additional mean of 13.7 ± 13.3 days with a catheter. Patients who failed the TOV were more likely to get a urinary tract infection compared with those who had an effective TOV (20.0% vs 4.7%, p < 0.001). All patients experienced significant improvements in IPSS, QoL, and Qmax at 1, 3, and/or 6 months. On multivariate analysis, a high baseline PVR was the only independent predictor of a failed TOV (odds ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.01). A greater proportion of patients with a baseline PVR >200 mL failed the TOV (40.0%) compared with patients with a baseline PVR <200 mL (10.9%, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Approximately one in eight patients failed the TOV following Rezum therapy. Baseline PVR was the only independent risk factor for a failed TOV. Nevertheless, all patients experienced significant relief of urinary symptoms. Patients with high baseline PVR, particularly >200 mL, may require a catheter for an extended duration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-73
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • benign prostatic hyperplasia
  • minimally invasive surgical therapy
  • postvoid residual
  • trial of void

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Factors and Real-World Short-Term Outcomes of a Failed Trial of Void after Rezum Therapy in a Multiethnic Population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this