Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Role of ecological modeling in risk assessment

  • Exponent, Inc.
  • Applied Biomathematics
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • Cadmus Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ecological models are useful tools for evaluating the ecological significance of observed or predicted effects of toxic chemicals on individual organisms. Current risk estimation approaches using hazard quotients for individual-level endpoints have limited utility for assessing risks at the population, ecosystem, and landscape levels, which are the most relevant indicators for environmental management. In this paper, we define different types of ecological models, summarize their input and output variables, and present examples of the role of some recommended models in chemical risk assessments. A variety of population and ecosystem models have been applied successfully to evaluate ecological risks, including population viability of endangered species, habitat fragmentation, and toxic chemical issues. In particular, population models are widely available, and their value in predicting dynamics of natural populations has been demonstrated. Although data are often limited on vital rates and dose-response functions needed for ecological modeling, accurate prediction of ecological effects may not be needed for all assessments. Often, a comparative assessment of risk (e.g., relative to baseline or reference) is of primary interest. Ecological modeling is currently a valuable approach for addressing many chemical risk assessment issues, including screening-level evaluations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)939-972
Number of pages34
JournalHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Keywords

  • Chemicals
  • Ecological model
  • Ecosystem
  • Population
  • Risk assessment
  • Toxic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Role of ecological modeling in risk assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this