Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Science Teacher Motivation and Evaluation Policy in a High-Stakes Testing State

  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This qualitative case study explored the teachers’ and administrators’ perceptions of a newly implemented teacher evaluation policy in a high-stakes testing state, and how this policy impacted their motivation. Five science teachers and their immediate supervisors were interviewed, and their perceptions were analyzed through motivational theories of incentivizing career behaviors. Findings suggest the overarching goal of improving teacher practice through accountability was facilitated by intrinsic motivation and challenged by weaknesses in policy design. These tensions could be mediated by localized control that improves stakeholder agency, peer learning communities, and the adoption of more reliable evaluation metrics. Implications for teacher buy-in of evaluation policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-40
Number of pages38
JournalEducational Policy
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • educational policy
  • high-stakes accountability
  • policy implementation
  • qualitative research
  • science education
  • secondary education
  • state policies
  • supervision
  • teacher quality
  • teacher-administrator relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science Teacher Motivation and Evaluation Policy in a High-Stakes Testing State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this