Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Searching for Judy: How Small Mysteries Affect Narrative Processes and Memory

  • Ohio State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Current theories of text processing say little about how authors' narrative choices, including the introduction of small mysteries, can affect readers' narrative experiences. Gerrig, Love, and McKoon (2009) provided evidence that 1 type of small mystery-a character introduced without information linking him or her to the story-affects readers' moment-by-moment processing. For that project, participants read stories that introduced characters by proper name alone (e.g., "Judy") or with information connecting the character to the rest of the story (e.g., "our principal Judy"). In an online recognition probe task, responses to the character's name 3 lines after his or her introduction were faster when the character had not been introduced with connecting information, suggesting that the character remained accessible awaiting resolution. In the 4 experiments in this article, we extend our theoretical analysis of small mysteries. In Experiments 1 and 2, we found evidence that trait information (e.g., "daredevil Judy") is not sufficient to connect a character to a text. In Experiments 3 and 4, we found evidence that the moment-by-moment processing effects of such small mysteries also affect readers' memory for the stories. We interpret the results in terms of Kintsch's (1988) construction-integration model of discourse processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)790-796
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Keywords

  • discourse processing
  • memory representation
  • mystery
  • narrative comprehension

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Searching for Judy: How Small Mysteries Affect Narrative Processes and Memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this