Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sensitivity of various extrastimulus techniques in patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias

  • Edward V. Platia
  • , H. Leon Greene
  • , Stephen C. Vlay
  • , J. A. Werner
  • , Brian Gross
  • , Philip R. Reid
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

One hundred seventeen consecutive patients with a history of sudden cardiac death (group I = 62 patients) or recurrent symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (group II = 55 patients) as well as 11 control subjects (group III) were studied with programmed electrical stimulation over the past year. Programmed right ventricular stimulation included premature stimulation during atrial pacing (A1V2 mode) and during ventricular pacing (V1V2 mode), double ventricular extrastimuli during ventricular pacing (V1V2V3), and brief bursts of rapid ventricular pacing (Vburst). Repetitive ventricular responses were defined as two or more ventricular premature beats produced by the final ventricular pacing stimulus occurring by intraventricular reentry. All but 13 patients were on antiarrhythmic therapy at the time of study. The incidence of repetitive ventricular responses induced by A1V2 pacing mode was 22% (22 of 104 patients) and that of sustained ventricular tachycardia was 1%. The sensitivity of inducing repetitive ventricular responses with V1V2 stimulation was 44% and that of sustained ventricular tachycardia was 7%; the sensitivity with V1V2V3 pacing mode was significantly higher at 77% and 25%, respectively. When V1V2V3 and Vburst stimulation were directly compared, the incidence of induction of repetitive ventricular responses and sustained ventricular tachycardia were comparable. The incidence of induction of repetitive ventricular responses and sustained ventricular tachycardia in groups I and II was similar; no repetitive ventricular responses were induced in group III patients. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity of either repetitive ventricular response or sustained ventricular tachycardia induction in patients with coronary disease compared with those with the diagnosis of noncoronary disease. We conclude that, contrary to an earlier report from our group, the incidence of induction of repetitive ventricular responses to single ventricular extrastimuli during atrial pacing is low in patients with a history of sudden death or recurrent ventricular tachycardia. The incidence of induction of repetitive ventricular responses and sustained ventricular tachycardia is highest using the V1V2V3 and Vburst modes of stimulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-703
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume106
Issue number4 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1983

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of various extrastimulus techniques in patients with serious ventricular arrhythmias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this