Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Socio-economic assessment and genetically engineered crops in Africa: Building knowledge for development?

  • Brian Dowd-Uribe
  • , Genowefa Blundo-Canto
  • , Dominic Glover
  • , Sélim Louafi
  • , Helena Shilomboleni
  • , Joeva Sean Rock
  • , Enoch M. Kikulwe
  • , Klara Fischer
  • , Pierre Benoît Joly
  • University of San Francisco
  • Université de Montpellier
  • UMR INNOVATION
  • University of Sussex
  • Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement
  • University of Waterloo
  • Bioversity International
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • INRAE

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100782
JournalGlobal Food Security
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Agriculture
  • Assessment
  • Development
  • Evaluation
  • Genetically engineered

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Socio-economic assessment and genetically engineered crops in Africa: Building knowledge for development?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this