Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum and method for analyzing detector DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images

  • Scott Dow
  • , Adrian Howansky
  • , Anthony R. Lubinsky
  • , Wei Zhao
  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Scintillators and photoconductors used in energy integrating detectors (EIDs) have inherent variations in their imaging response to single-detected X-rays due to variations in X-ray energy deposition and secondary quanta generation and transport, which degrades DQE(f). The imaging response of X-ray scintillators to single X-rays may be recorded and studied using single X-ray imaging (SXI) experiments; however, no method currently exists for relating SXI experimental results to EID DQE(f). This work proposes a general analytical framework for computing and analyzing the DQE(f) performance of EIDs from single X-ray image ensembles using a spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum. Methods: A spatial frequency (f)-dependent gain, (Formula presented.), is defined as the Fourier transform of the imaging response of an EID to a single-detected X-ray. A f-dependent pulse-height spectrum, (Formula presented.), is defined as the 2D probability density function of (Formula presented.) over the complex plane. (Formula presented.) is used to define a f-dependent Swank factor, AS(f), which fully characterizes the DQE(f) degradation due to single X-ray noise. AS(f) is analyzed in terms of its degradation due to Swank noise, variations in the frequency-dependent attenuation of (Formula presented.), and noise in (Formula presented.) which occurs due to variations in the asymmetry in each single X-ray's imaging response. Three example imaging systems are simulated to demonstrate the impact of depth-dependent variation in (Formula presented.), remote energy deposition, and a finite number of secondary quanta, on (Formula presented.), AS(f), MTF(f), and NPS(f)/NPS(0), which are computed from ensembles of single X-ray images. The same is also demonstrated by simulating a realistic imaging system; that is, a Gd2O2S-based EID. Using the latter imaging system, the convergence of AS(f) estimates is investigated as a function of the number of detected X-rays per ensemble. Results: Depth-dependent (Formula presented.) variation resulted in AS(f) degradation exclusively due to depth-dependent optical Swank noise and the Lubberts effect. Conversely, the majority of AS(f) degradation caused by remote energy deposition and finite secondary quanta occurred due to variations in (Formula presented.). When using input X-ray energies below the K-edge of Gd, variations in the frequency-dependent attenuation of (Formula presented.) accounted for the majority of AS(f) degradation in the GOS-based EID, and very little Swank noise and variations in (Formula presented.) were observed. Above the K-edge, however, AS(f) degradation due to Swank noise and variations in (Formula presented.) greatly increased. The convergence of AS(f) was limited by variation in (Formula presented.); imaging systems with more variation in (Formula presented.) required more detected X-rays per ensemble. Conclusions: An analytical framework is proposed that generalizes the pulse-height spectrum and Swank factor to arbitrary f. The impact of single X-ray noise sources, such as the Lubberts effect, remote energy deposition, and finite secondary quanta on detector performance, may be represented using (Formula presented.), and quantified using AS(f). The approach may be used to compute MTF(f), NPS(f), and DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images and provides an additional tool to analyze proposed EID designs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-128
Number of pages22
JournalMedical Physics
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum and method for analyzing detector DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this