Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Status of proof-of-principle experiment for coherent electron cooling

  • I. Pinayev
  • , S. Belomestnykh
  • , J. Bengtsson
  • , I. Ben-Zvi
  • , A. Elizarov
  • , A. V. Fedotov
  • , D. M. Gassner
  • , Y. Hao
  • , D. Kayran
  • , V. N. Litvinenko
  • , G. Mahler
  • , W. Meng
  • , T. Roser
  • , B. Sheehy
  • , R. Than
  • , J. Tuozzolo
  • , G. Wang
  • , S. D. Webb
  • , V. Yakimenko
  • , M. A. Kholopov
  • P. Vobly, A. Hutton, G. A. Krafft, M. Poelker, R. Rimmer, G. I. Bell, D. L. Bruhwiler, V. H. Ranjbar, B. T. Schwartz
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP)
  • Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
  • Tech-X Corporation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Coherent electron cooling (CEC) offers a potential to significantly boost the luminosity of high-energy, highintensity hadron colliders. To verify this concept, we conduct proof-of-principle (PoP) experiment at the RHIC [1]. In this paper, we describe the current experimental setup that will be installed into the RHIC's 2 o'clock interaction regions. We detail the current design, the status of acquiring equipment, and our estimates of the expected beam parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIPAC 2012 - International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012
Pages400-402
Number of pages3
StatePublished - 2012
Event3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012, IPAC 2012 - New Orleans, LA, United States
Duration: May 20 2012May 25 2012

Publication series

NameIPAC 2012 - International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012

Conference

Conference3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012, IPAC 2012
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityNew Orleans, LA
Period05/20/1205/25/12

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Status of proof-of-principle experiment for coherent electron cooling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this