Abstract
Several papers show that a privatization of the social security system will not be politically supported by the current generations. The asymmetry in the timing of welfare gains and losses is what generates a status quo bias in favor of the unfunded system. We explore a simple mechanism to offset the status quo problem using a general-equilibrium overlapping generations model with endogenous labor supply calibrated to the Spanish economy. The mechanism implies a privatization of the social security system together with the elimination of compulsory retirement rules. Along the transition path, this mechanism drastically shortens (from three decades to only one decade) the convergence to the new steady state, diminishing the asymmetry in the timing of welfare gains and losses. As a result, there is an increase beyond 50% in the fraction of individuals that are better off with the implementation of such a reform.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 691-710 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Macroeconomic Dynamics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2003 |
Keywords
- Credit Constraints
- Dynamic General Equilibrium
- Simulation
- Transitional Dynamics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Status quo problem in social security reforms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver