Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Structure-activity studies of the inhibition of FabI, the enoyl reductase from Escherichia coli, by Triclosan: Kinetic analysis of mutant FabIs

  • Sharada Sivaraman
  • , Jacque Zwahlen
  • , Alasdair F. Bell
  • , Lizbeth Hedstrom
  • , Peter J. Tonge
  • Stony Brook University
  • Brandeis University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

Triclosan, a common antibacterial additive used in consumer products, is an inhibitor of FabI, the enoyl reductase enzyme from type II bacterial fatty acid biosynthesis. In agreement with previous studies [Ward, W. H., Holdgate, G. A., Rowsell, S., McLean, E. G., Pauptit, R. A., Clayton, E., Nichols, W. W., Colls, J. G., Minshull, C. A., Jude, D. A., Mistry, A., Timms, D., Camble, R., Hales, N. J., Britton, C. J., and Taylor, I. W. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 12514-12525], we report here that triclosan is a slow, reversible, tight binding inhibitor of the FabI from Escherichia coli. Triclosan binds preferentially to the E·NAD+ form of the wild-type enzyme with a K1 value of 23 pM. In agreement with genetic selection experiments [McMurry, L. M., Oethinger, M., and Levy, S. B. (1998) Nature 394, 531-532], the affinity of triclosan for the FabI mutants G93V, M159T, and F203L is substantially reduced, binding preferentially to the E.NAD+ forms of G93V, M159T, and F203L with K1 values of 0.2 μM, 4 nM, and 0.9 nM, respectively. Triclosan binding to the E·NADH form of F203L can also be detected and is defined by a K2 value of 51 nM. We have also characterized the Y156F and A197M mutants to compare and contrast the binding of triclosan to InhA, the homologous enoyl reductase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. As observed for InhA, Y156F FabI has a decreased affinity for triclosan and the inhibitor binds to both E·NAD+ and E·NADH forms of the enzyme with K1 and K2 values of 3 and 30 nM, respectively. The replacement of A197 with Met has no impact on triclosan affinity, indicating that differences in the sequence of the conserved active site loop cannot explain the 10000-fold difference in affinities of FabI and InhA for triclosan.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4406-4413
Number of pages8
JournalBiochemistry
Volume42
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Structure-activity studies of the inhibition of FabI, the enoyl reductase from Escherichia coli, by Triclosan: Kinetic analysis of mutant FabIs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this