Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sublobar resection in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

  • Stony Brook University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Though lobectomy remains the standard of care for resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer, a number of studies have been published in the last 24 months exploring the role of sublobar resection in the treatment of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Large retrospective studies comparing lobar and sublobar resection show similar overall and disease-free survival. Survival and local control for sublobar resections are best for tumors smaller than 2 cm and with margins greater than 2 cm. Importantly, sublobar resections commonly have less thorough nodal dissection and incomplete pathologic staging; this may have important therapeutic consequences. No formal comparison of segmentectomy to wedge resection has been performed although bias towards segmentectomy resulting in better outcomes than nonanatomic wedge resection continues. Sublobar resection is especially interesting for patients with prior resection, bronchoalveolar carcinoma, and the elderly. Radiologic criteria for selecting candidates appropriate for sublobar resection are evolving. SUMMARY: Sublobar resection is an alternative therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer for patients with physiologic impairment unable to undergo lobectomy. The literature also suggests a role for patients with prior lung resection, bronchoalveolar carcinoma, peripheral tumors less than 2 cm, and for the elderly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-296
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Keywords

  • Lobectomy
  • Nonsmall cell lung cancer
  • Sublobar resection
  • Thoracic surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sublobar resection in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this