Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Symbiotic entrenchment through ecological Catch-22

  • Thomas H. Naragon
  • , Joani W. Viliunas
  • , Mina Yousefelahiyeh
  • , Adrian Brückner
  • , Julian M. Wagner
  • , K. Esther Okamoto
  • , Hannah M. Ryon
  • , Danny Collinson
  • , Sheila A. Kitchen
  • , Reto S. Wijker
  • , Alex L. Sessions
  • , Joseph Parker
  • California Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Why symbiotic organisms evolve irreversible dependencies on hosts is an outstanding question. We report a biological stealth device in a beetle that permits infiltration of ant societies. Via transcriptional silencing, the beetle switches off biosynthesis of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs)—body surface pheromones that function pleiotropically as a waxy desiccation barrier. Silencing transforms the beetle into a chemical blank slate onto which ant CHCs are transferred via grooming behavior, leading to perfect chemical mimicry and acceptance into the colony. Silencing is irreversible, however, forcing the beetle into a chronic dependence on ants to both maintain mimicry and prevent desiccation. We show that evolutionary reversion of the silencing mechanism would render the beetle detectable to ants; conversely, reversion of the beetle’s attraction to ants would render it desiccation prone. Symbiotic entrenchment can thus arise from epistasis between symbiotic traits, locking lineages into a Catch-22 that obstructs reversion to living freely.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1228-1244.e24
JournalCell
Volume189
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 19 2026

Keywords

  • ants
  • behavior
  • biosynthesis
  • cell biology
  • chemical ecology
  • evolution
  • irreversibility
  • obligate symbiosis
  • rove beetles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Symbiotic entrenchment through ecological Catch-22'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this