TY - GEN
T1 - TAG parser evaluation using textual entailments
AU - Xu, Pauli
AU - Frank, Robert
AU - Kasai, Jungo
AU - Rambow, Owen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Association for Computational Linguistics.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Parser Evaluation using Textual Entailments (PETE, Yuret et al. (2013)) is a restricted textual entailment task designed to evaluate in a uniform manner parsers that produce different representations of syntactic structure. In PETE, entailments can be resolved using syntactic relations alone, and do not implicate lexical semantics or world knowledge. We evaluate TAG parsers on the PETE task, and compare our results to the state-of-the-art. Our TAG parser combined with structural transformations to compute entailments outperforms the CCG-based results on the development set, though it falls behind these results on the test set. The CCG parser makes use of a number of heuristics for entailment comparison, however. Adding such heuristics to our best TAG parser yields state-of-the-art results on the test set when using accuracy as a metric. This sensitivity to heuristics suggests that the PETE task may suffer from an unrepresentative development set, and that we need to improve upon formalism-independent parsing evaluation methods.
AB - Parser Evaluation using Textual Entailments (PETE, Yuret et al. (2013)) is a restricted textual entailment task designed to evaluate in a uniform manner parsers that produce different representations of syntactic structure. In PETE, entailments can be resolved using syntactic relations alone, and do not implicate lexical semantics or world knowledge. We evaluate TAG parsers on the PETE task, and compare our results to the state-of-the-art. Our TAG parser combined with structural transformations to compute entailments outperforms the CCG-based results on the development set, though it falls behind these results on the test set. The CCG parser makes use of a number of heuristics for entailment comparison, however. Adding such heuristics to our best TAG parser yields state-of-the-art results on the test set when using accuracy as a metric. This sensitivity to heuristics suggests that the PETE task may suffer from an unrepresentative development set, and that we need to improve upon formalism-independent parsing evaluation methods.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054767731
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85054767731
T3 - TAG+ 2017 - 13th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, Proceedings
SP - 132
EP - 141
BT - TAG+ 2017 - 13th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, Proceedings
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
T2 - 13th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, TAG+ 2017
Y2 - 4 September 2017 through 6 September 2017
ER -