TY - JOUR
T1 - Tecovirimat for the Treatment of Mpox
AU - STOMP/A5418 Investigators
AU - Zucker, Jason
AU - Fischer, William A.
AU - Zheng, Lu
AU - McCarthy, Caitlyn
AU - Saha, Pooja T.
AU - Javan, Arzhang Cyrus
AU - Greninger, Alex
AU - Hamill, Matthew M.
AU - Leslie, Kieron
AU - Brooks, Kristina M.
AU - Berardi, Jonathan
AU - Smith, Davey
AU - Hosey, Lara
AU - Aldrovandi, Grace
AU - Ferbas, Kathie
AU - Day, Cheryl
AU - Bender Ignacio, Rachel A.
AU - Bolan, Robert
AU - Glesby, Marshall J.
AU - Landovitz, Raphael J.
AU - Luetkemeyer, Anne F.
AU - Sierra Madero, Juan
AU - Gandhi, Rajesh T.
AU - Nachman, Sharon
AU - Eron, Joe
AU - Currier, Judith S.
AU - Wilkin, Timothy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2026 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2026/2/26
Y1 - 2026/2/26
N2 - BACKGROUND: Tecovirimat is approved for smallpox treatment under the Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule on the basis of efficacy in nonhuman primate models of mpox (previously known as monkeypox). However, the clinical efficacy of tecovirimat against human clade II mpox is unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oral tecovirimat in adults with laboratory-confirmed clade II mpox. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tecovirimat or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was clinical resolution, assessed in a time-to-event analysis in participants with active skin or mucosal lesions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in pain, assessed in all participants with laboratory-confirmed mpox and in those with severe pain at baseline (pain score, 7 to 10; scale, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]); complete lesion healing (assessed in a time-to-event analysis); viral DNA clearance; and safety. RESULTS: Of 412 participants who underwent randomization (275 to tecovirimat and 137 to placebo), 344 had laboratory-confirmed mpox, and 336 had active skin or mucosal lesions and were included in the primary analysis. By day 29, the estimated cumulative incidence of clinical resolution was 83% with tecovirimat and 84% with placebo; the competing-risks hazard ratio for clinical resolution was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.31; P = 0.89). No substantial between-group differences were seen in pain reduction among participants with severe pain (difference, 0.1 point; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.0), in complete lesion healing (competing-risks hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26), or in viral DNA clearance. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was similar in the two groups (4% with tecovirimat and 3% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed no evidence that tecovirimat therapy shortened the time to clinical resolution, reduced pain, or increased viral clearance among adults with clade II mpox. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health; STOMP/A5418 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05534984.).
AB - BACKGROUND: Tecovirimat is approved for smallpox treatment under the Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule on the basis of efficacy in nonhuman primate models of mpox (previously known as monkeypox). However, the clinical efficacy of tecovirimat against human clade II mpox is unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oral tecovirimat in adults with laboratory-confirmed clade II mpox. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tecovirimat or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was clinical resolution, assessed in a time-to-event analysis in participants with active skin or mucosal lesions. Secondary outcomes included reduction in pain, assessed in all participants with laboratory-confirmed mpox and in those with severe pain at baseline (pain score, 7 to 10; scale, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]); complete lesion healing (assessed in a time-to-event analysis); viral DNA clearance; and safety. RESULTS: Of 412 participants who underwent randomization (275 to tecovirimat and 137 to placebo), 344 had laboratory-confirmed mpox, and 336 had active skin or mucosal lesions and were included in the primary analysis. By day 29, the estimated cumulative incidence of clinical resolution was 83% with tecovirimat and 84% with placebo; the competing-risks hazard ratio for clinical resolution was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.31; P = 0.89). No substantial between-group differences were seen in pain reduction among participants with severe pain (difference, 0.1 point; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.0), in complete lesion healing (competing-risks hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26), or in viral DNA clearance. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was similar in the two groups (4% with tecovirimat and 3% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: This trial showed no evidence that tecovirimat therapy shortened the time to clinical resolution, reduced pain, or increased viral clearance among adults with clade II mpox. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health; STOMP/A5418 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05534984.).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031315367
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2506495
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2506495
M3 - Article
C2 - 41740032
AN - SCOPUS:105031315367
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 394
SP - 884
EP - 895
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 9
ER -