TY - JOUR
T1 - Temporal association of prostate cancer incidence with World Trade Center rescue/recovery work
AU - Goldfarb, David G.
AU - Zeig-Owens, Rachel
AU - Kristjansson, Dana
AU - Li, Jiehui
AU - Brackbill, Robert M.
AU - Farfel, Mark R.
AU - Cone, James E.
AU - Yung, Janette
AU - Kahn, Amy R.
AU - Qiao, Baozhen
AU - Schymura, Maria J.
AU - Webber, Mayris P.
AU - Dasaro, Christopher R.
AU - Shapiro, Moshe
AU - Todd, Andrew C.
AU - Prezant, David J.
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Hall, Charles B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background The World Trade Center (WTC) attacks on 11 September 2001 created a hazardous environment with known and suspected carcinogens. Previous studies have identified an increased risk of prostate cancer in responder cohorts compared with the general male population. Objectives To estimate the length of time to prostate cancer among WTC rescue/recovery workers by determining specific time periods during which the risk was significantly elevated. Methods Person-time accruals began 6 months after enrolment into a WTC cohort and ended at death or 12/31/2015. Cancer data were obtained through linkages with 13 state cancer registries. New York State was the comparison population. We used Poisson regression to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs; change points in rate ratios were estimated using profile likelihood. Results The analytic cohort included 54 394 male rescue/recovery workers. We observed 1120 incident prostate cancer cases. During 2002–2006, no association with WTC exposure was detected. Beginning in 2007, a 24% increased risk (HR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32) was observed among WTC rescue/recovery workers when compared with New York State. Comparing those who arrived earliest at the disaster site on the morning of 11 September 2001 or any time on 12 September 2001 to those who first arrived later, we observed a positive, monotonic, dose-response association in the early (2002–2006) and late (2007–2015) periods. Conclusions Risk of prostate cancer was significantly elevated beginning in 2007 in the WTC combined rescue/ recovery cohort. While unique exposures at the disaster site might have contributed to the observed effect, screening practices including routine prostate specific antigen screening cannot be discounted.
AB - Background The World Trade Center (WTC) attacks on 11 September 2001 created a hazardous environment with known and suspected carcinogens. Previous studies have identified an increased risk of prostate cancer in responder cohorts compared with the general male population. Objectives To estimate the length of time to prostate cancer among WTC rescue/recovery workers by determining specific time periods during which the risk was significantly elevated. Methods Person-time accruals began 6 months after enrolment into a WTC cohort and ended at death or 12/31/2015. Cancer data were obtained through linkages with 13 state cancer registries. New York State was the comparison population. We used Poisson regression to estimate hazard ratios and 95% CIs; change points in rate ratios were estimated using profile likelihood. Results The analytic cohort included 54 394 male rescue/recovery workers. We observed 1120 incident prostate cancer cases. During 2002–2006, no association with WTC exposure was detected. Beginning in 2007, a 24% increased risk (HR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32) was observed among WTC rescue/recovery workers when compared with New York State. Comparing those who arrived earliest at the disaster site on the morning of 11 September 2001 or any time on 12 September 2001 to those who first arrived later, we observed a positive, monotonic, dose-response association in the early (2002–2006) and late (2007–2015) periods. Conclusions Risk of prostate cancer was significantly elevated beginning in 2007 in the WTC combined rescue/ recovery cohort. While unique exposures at the disaster site might have contributed to the observed effect, screening practices including routine prostate specific antigen screening cannot be discounted.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85116953633
U2 - 10.1136/oemed-2021-107405
DO - 10.1136/oemed-2021-107405
M3 - Article
C2 - 34507966
AN - SCOPUS:85116953633
SN - 1351-0711
VL - 78
SP - 699
EP - 706
JO - Occupational and Environmental Medicine
JF - Occupational and Environmental Medicine
IS - 10
ER -