Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Temporal myopia: A case of promising new technologies, the federal government, and inherent conflicts of interest

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines how the dual role of the federal government in promoting and regulating promising new industrial technologies may evolve to embody an inherent conflict of interest, a condition referred to as the "paradox of partnerships." Using a temporal perspective to explore relevant paradoxes of partnerships, this research speculates on the parallels of two recent technologies: nuclear power and nanotechnology. We conclude that while government-industry partnerships may seem relatively uncontroversial during early phases of technological development, such partnerships can prove problematic years later - As the government moves away from its role as a technology promoter and toward its role as an essential regulator. Lessons learned from the downfall of the nuclear power industry suggest that as nanotechnology becomes technically and economically feasible, early government investments may come to look more like entanglements - ones that may involve irreconcilable incentives that jeopardize the ultimate rewards. Copyright copy; 2013 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWilliam R. Freudenburg, A Life in Social Research
PublisherJAI Press
Pages259-276
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)9781781907344
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Publication series

NameResearch in Social Problems and Public Policy
Volume21
ISSN (Print)0196-1152

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • Public-private partnerships
  • Risk management
  • Temporal dimensions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal myopia: A case of promising new technologies, the federal government, and inherent conflicts of interest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this