Abstract
Historical scholars often adopt a solitary ethic, conceiving of their work as the product of a lonely and isolated individual toiling away in a dusty archive. In this article, we assess the validity of this ethic by examining the actual practice of archival research. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with practicing historical sociologists, we reveal that the solitary ethic is largely illusory, and that, instead, the archive is in fact a robustly social world. We identify two core sets of social relationships in the archive—relationships with the archivist and with the archival community—that shape the historical sociologist’s experience in the archive. We further show that historical sociologists mobilize these interactions to solve concrete research problems in the archive. We thus argue that the archive’s social character should be understood as a methodological opportunity for historical sociologists, allowing them to maximize and extend their research by inspiring creative research strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 407-426 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Qualitative Sociology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Keywords
- Archival cultures
- Archives
- Archivists
- Historical methods
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Archive as a Social World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver