Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The commercialization of robotic surgery: Unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals

  • Maria B. Schiavone
  • , Eugenia C. Kuo
  • , R. Wendel Naumann
  • , William M. Burke
  • , Sharyn N. Lewin
  • , Alfred I. Neugut
  • , Dawn L. Hershman
  • , Thomas J. Herzog
  • , Jason D. Wright
  • Columbia University
  • Carolinas Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We analyzed the content, quality, and accuracy of information provided on hospital web sites about robotic gynecologic surgery. Study Design: An analysis of hospitals with more than 200 beds from a selection of states was performed. Hospital web sites were analyzed for the content and quality of data regarding robotic-assisted surgery. Results: Among 432 hospitals, the web sites of 192 (44.4%) contained marketing for robotic gynecologic surgery. Stock images (64.1%) and text (24.0%) derived from the robot manufacturer were frequent. Although most sites reported improved perioperative outcomes, limitations of robotics including cost, complications, and operative time were discussed only 3.7%, 1.6%, and 3.7% of the time, respectively. Only 47.9% of the web sites described a comparison group. Conclusion: Marketing of robotic gynecologic surgery is widespread. Much of the content is not based on high-quality data, fails to present alternative procedures, and relies on stock text and images.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174.e1-174.e7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume207
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Keywords

  • da Vinci
  • marketing
  • robot
  • robotic surgery
  • Web

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The commercialization of robotic surgery: Unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this