Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline

  • Sophie Walsh
  • , Eunhee Choi
  • , Chloe Fang
  • , Keisuke Narita
  • , Maria Cepeda
  • , Brulinda Frangaj
  • , Sofia Kim
  • , Yaniris Mercado
  • , Riley Nesheim-Case
  • , Uriel Alvira Ramirez
  • , Matthew Barrett
  • , Joseph E. Schwartz
  • , Daichi Shimbo
  • Columbia University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg). METHODS: Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5–10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1–0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. RESULTS: Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)288-294
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Hypertension
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2025

Keywords

  • ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
  • hypertension screening
  • masked hypertension
  • office blood pressure measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this