Abstract
Drowning is a diagnosis of exclusion based on circumstantial and autopsy correlation. Sugimura proposed a threshold value of 14.1 for the Drowning Index (DI), the ratio of lung and pleural fluid to spleen weight, as a surrogate marker to diagnose drowning. We questioned the use of DI in diagnosing drowning. We compared DI between three groups-drowning, mechanical asphyxia, and myocardial infarct-seen at Broward MEO from 2008 to 2009. Only 9.4% of 53 drownings exceeded the DI threshold of 14.1, while 30% of 10 mechanical asphyxias and 40% of 10 myocardial infarcts had DI >14.1. Sensitivity for the DI test was <10% and specificity 60-70%. Median DI values for all groups were <10. Mann-Whitney U-test was not statistically significant between groups. The DI is neither sensitive nor specific and lacks any utility in the diagnosis of drowning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 399-403 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Forensic Sciences |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- Asphyxia
- Cause of death
- Drowning
- Drowning index
- Forensic science
- Myocardial infarct
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Drowning Index: Implementation in Drowning, Mechanical Asphyxia, and Acute Myocardial Infarct Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver