Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Drowning Index: Implementation in Drowning, Mechanical Asphyxia, and Acute Myocardial Infarct Cases

  • Broward County Medical Examiner and Trauma Services
  • Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drowning is a diagnosis of exclusion based on circumstantial and autopsy correlation. Sugimura proposed a threshold value of 14.1 for the Drowning Index (DI), the ratio of lung and pleural fluid to spleen weight, as a surrogate marker to diagnose drowning. We questioned the use of DI in diagnosing drowning. We compared DI between three groups-drowning, mechanical asphyxia, and myocardial infarct-seen at Broward MEO from 2008 to 2009. Only 9.4% of 53 drownings exceeded the DI threshold of 14.1, while 30% of 10 mechanical asphyxias and 40% of 10 myocardial infarcts had DI >14.1. Sensitivity for the DI test was <10% and specificity 60-70%. Median DI values for all groups were <10. Mann-Whitney U-test was not statistically significant between groups. The DI is neither sensitive nor specific and lacks any utility in the diagnosis of drowning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-403
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • Asphyxia
  • Cause of death
  • Drowning
  • Drowning index
  • Forensic science
  • Myocardial infarct

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Drowning Index: Implementation in Drowning, Mechanical Asphyxia, and Acute Myocardial Infarct Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this