Abstract
Aim: To compare the economic value of EDWARDS INTUITY Elite™ (EIE) valve system for rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) in a full sternotomy (FS) approach (EIE-FS-RDAVR) versus FS-AVR using conventional stented bioprosthesis. Data & methods: A simulation model to compare each treatment's 30-day inpatient utilization and complication rates utilized: clinical end points obtained from the TRANSFORM trial patient subset (EIE-FS-RDAVR) and a best evidence review of the published literature (FS-AVR); and costs from the Premier database and published literature. Results: EIE-FS-RDAVR costs $800 less than FS-AVR per surgery episode attributable to lowered complication rates and utilization. Combined with the lower mortality, EIE-FS-RDAVR was a superior (dominant) technology versus FS-AVR. Conclusion: This preliminary investigation of EIE-FS-RDAVR versus conventional FS-AVR found the EIE valve offered superior economic value over a 30-day period. Real-world analyses with additional long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate if this result can be replicated over a longer timeframe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 293-302 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- INTUITY
- TRANSFORM trial
- aortic valve replacement
- cost evaluation
- full sternotomy
- rapid deployment
- simulation
- symptomatic aortic stenosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The economic value of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via full sternotomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver