Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Effect of Composite Thickness on the Stress Distribution Pattern of Restored Premolar Teeth with Cusp Reduction

  • Narges Panahandeh
  • , Hassan Torabzadeh
  • , Nargess Ziaee
  • , Mina Mahdian
  • , Bahman Tootiaee
  • , Amir Ghasemi
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Different thicknesses of restorative material can alter the stress distribution pattern in remaining tooth structure. The assumption is that a thicker composite restoration will induce a higher fracture resistance. Therefore, the present study evaluated the effect of composite thickness on stress distribution in a restored premolar with cusp reduction. Materials and Methods: A 3D solid model of a maxillary second premolar was prepared and meshed. MOD cavities were designed with different cusp reduction thicknesses (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5 mm). Cavities were restored with Valux Plus composite. They were loaded with 200 N force on the occlusal surface in the direction of the long axis. Von Mises stresses were evaluated with Abaqus software. Results: Stress increased from occlusal to gingival and was maximum in the cervical region. The stressed area in the palatal cusp was more than that of the buccal cusp. Increasing the thickness of composite altered the shear stress to compressive stress in the occlusal area of the teeth. Conclusion: The model with 2.5 mm cusp reduction exhibited the most even stress distribution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-445
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Composite onlay
  • direct restoration
  • finite element method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Composite Thickness on the Stress Distribution Pattern of Restored Premolar Teeth with Cusp Reduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this