Abstract
Robert P. Crease tries to understand the scientific community's fascination for Rosalind Franklin's contribution to the discovery of the double-helix structure of DNA. He refutes the theory that Franklin's contribution to the Nobel-prize winning study is insufficiently recognized today. He also challenges the allegation that James Watson and Francis Crick, the eventual Nobel Prize winners for Physiology or Medicine stole something from Franklin and presented it as their own.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 17 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Volume | 16 |
| No | 3 |
| Specialist publication | Physics World |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Rosalind Franklin question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver