Abstract
In this article, we articulate the critical differences between memory-based processing and explanation-based processing. We suggest that the most important claim of memory-based text processing is that the automatic processes that function with respect to text processing are all applications of ordinary memory processes. This claim contrasts with explanation-based accounts that argue that some automatic processes are special to text processing and enact particular reader goals. We review evidence that supports the memory-based approach but we also suggest how it might properly be falsified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-242 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2-3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The scope of memory-based processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver