Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders

  • Nicholas R. Eaton
  • , Robert F. Krueger
  • , Kristian E. Markon
  • , Katherine M. Keyes
  • , Andrew E. Skodol
  • , Melanie Wall
  • , Deborah S. Hasin
  • , Bridget F. Grant
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Iowa
  • Columbia University
  • University of Arizona
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

188 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multivariate comorbidity research indicates mood and anxiety (internalizing) disorders share one or more common liabilities, but categorical, dimensional, and hybrid accounts of these liabilities have not been directly compared. We modeled seven internalizing disorders in a nationally representative sample of 43,093 individuals via confirmatory factor, latent class, exploratory factor mixture, and exploratory structural equation modeling analyses. A two-dimensional (distress-fear) liability structure fit best and replicated across gender, assessment waves, and lifetime/12-month diagnoses. These liabilities, not disorder-specific variation, predicted future internalizing pathology, suicide attempts, angina, and ulcer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-92
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume122
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Classes
  • Depression
  • Dimensions
  • Internalizing
  • Psychopathology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Structure and predictive validity of the internalizing disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this