Abstract
In this paper, we consider the following question: what is the worst possible page-replacement strategy? Our goal is to devise an online strategy that has the highest possible fraction of page faults as compared to the worst offline strategy. We show that there is no deterministic, online page-replacement strategy that is competitive with the worst offline strategy. We give a randomized strategy based on the "most-recently-used" heuristic and show that this strategy is the worst possible online page-replacement strategy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 175-185 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Theory of Computing Systems |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2009 |
Keywords
- Caching
- Competitive analysis
- Online algorithms
- Page replacement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The worst page-replacement policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver