TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards reporting guidelines of research using whole-body vibration as training or treatment regimen in human subjects—A Delphi consensus study
AU - Wuestefeld, Anika
AU - Fuermaier, Anselm B.M.
AU - Bernardo-Filho, Mario
AU - da Cunha de Sá-Caputo, Danúbia
AU - Rittweger, Jörn
AU - Schoenau, Eckhard
AU - Stark, Christina
AU - Marin, Pedro J.
AU - Seixas, Adérito
AU - Judex, Stefan
AU - Taiar, Redha
AU - Nyakas, Csaba
AU - van der Zee, Eddy A.
AU - van Heuvelen, Marieke J.G.
AU - Tucha, Oliver
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wuestefeld et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Background Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a method utilizing vibrating platforms to expose individuals to mechanical vibration. In its various applications, it has been linked to improved muscular, skeletal, metabolic, or cognitive functioning, quality of life, and physiological parameters such as blood pressure. Most evidence concerning WBV is inconclusive and meta-analytical reviews may not readily produce insights since the research has a risk of misunderstandings of vibration parameters and incomplete reporting occurs. This study aims at laying an empirical foundation for reporting guidelines for human WBV studies to improve the quality of reporting and the currently limited comparability between studies. Method The Delphi methodology is employed to exploit the integrated knowledge of WBV experts to distil the specific aspects of WBV methodology that should be included in such guidelines. Over three rounds of completing online questionnaires, the expert panel (round 1/2/3: 51/ 40/37 experts respectively from 17 countries with an average of 19.4 years of WBV research experience) rated candidate items. Results A 40-item list was established based on the ratings of the individual items from the expert panel with a large final consensus (94.6%). Conclusion The final consensus indicates comprehensiveness and valuableness of the list. The results are in line with previous guidelines but expand these extensively. The present results may therefore serve as a foundation for updated guidelines for reporting human WBV studies in order to improve the quality of reporting of WBV studies, improve comparability of studies and facilitate the development of WBV study designs.
AB - Background Whole-body vibration (WBV) is a method utilizing vibrating platforms to expose individuals to mechanical vibration. In its various applications, it has been linked to improved muscular, skeletal, metabolic, or cognitive functioning, quality of life, and physiological parameters such as blood pressure. Most evidence concerning WBV is inconclusive and meta-analytical reviews may not readily produce insights since the research has a risk of misunderstandings of vibration parameters and incomplete reporting occurs. This study aims at laying an empirical foundation for reporting guidelines for human WBV studies to improve the quality of reporting and the currently limited comparability between studies. Method The Delphi methodology is employed to exploit the integrated knowledge of WBV experts to distil the specific aspects of WBV methodology that should be included in such guidelines. Over three rounds of completing online questionnaires, the expert panel (round 1/2/3: 51/ 40/37 experts respectively from 17 countries with an average of 19.4 years of WBV research experience) rated candidate items. Results A 40-item list was established based on the ratings of the individual items from the expert panel with a large final consensus (94.6%). Conclusion The final consensus indicates comprehensiveness and valuableness of the list. The results are in line with previous guidelines but expand these extensively. The present results may therefore serve as a foundation for updated guidelines for reporting human WBV studies in order to improve the quality of reporting of WBV studies, improve comparability of studies and facilitate the development of WBV study designs.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85088473579
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0235905
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0235905
M3 - Article
C2 - 32697809
AN - SCOPUS:85088473579
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 7
M1 - e0235905
ER -