TY - GEN
T1 - Two results about quantum messages
AU - Klauck, Hartmut
AU - Podder, Supartha
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - We prove two results about the relationship between quantum and classical messages. Our first contribution is to show how to replace a quantum message in a one-way communication protocol by a deterministic message, establishing that for all partial Boolean functions f:{0,1} n ×{0,1} m →{0,1} we have D A→B (f)≤O(Q A→B,*·m). This bound was previously known for total functions, while for partial functions this improves on results by Aaronson [1,2], in which either a log-factor on the right hand is present, or the left hand side is RA→B(f), and in which also no entanglement is allowed. In our second contribution we investigate the power of quantum proofs over classical proofs. We give the first example of a scenario in which quantum proofs lead to exponential savings in computing a Boolean function, for quantum verifiers. The previously only known separation between the power of quantum and classical proofs is in a setting where the input is also quantum [3]. We exhibit a partial Boolean function f, such that there is a one-way quantum communication protocol receiving a quantum proof (i.e., a protocol of type QMA) that has cost O(logn) for f, whereas every one-way quantum protocol for f receiving a classical proof (protocol of type QCMA) requires communication.
AB - We prove two results about the relationship between quantum and classical messages. Our first contribution is to show how to replace a quantum message in a one-way communication protocol by a deterministic message, establishing that for all partial Boolean functions f:{0,1} n ×{0,1} m →{0,1} we have D A→B (f)≤O(Q A→B,*·m). This bound was previously known for total functions, while for partial functions this improves on results by Aaronson [1,2], in which either a log-factor on the right hand is present, or the left hand side is RA→B(f), and in which also no entanglement is allowed. In our second contribution we investigate the power of quantum proofs over classical proofs. We give the first example of a scenario in which quantum proofs lead to exponential savings in computing a Boolean function, for quantum verifiers. The previously only known separation between the power of quantum and classical proofs is in a setting where the input is also quantum [3]. We exhibit a partial Boolean function f, such that there is a one-way quantum communication protocol receiving a quantum proof (i.e., a protocol of type QMA) that has cost O(logn) for f, whereas every one-way quantum protocol for f receiving a classical proof (protocol of type QCMA) requires communication.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84906225613
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-662-44465-8_38
DO - 10.1007/978-3-662-44465-8_38
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84906225613
SN - 9783662444641
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 445
EP - 456
BT - Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2014 - 39th International Symposium, MFCS 2014, Proceedings
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 39th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2014
Y2 - 25 August 2014 through 29 August 2014
ER -