Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain

  • Stony Brook University
  • University of Pittsburgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

224 Scopus citations

Abstract

To better understand the association between pain recalled over a previous week and the average of multiple momentary reports of pain taken during the same period, 68 patients with chronic pain completed both weekly recall and momentary reports over a 2-week period and assessed their change in pain over the 2 weeks. Pearson correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients were computed to index three different ways of comparing the measures on both a between-person and within-person basis. Between-person correspondence between weekly and momentary reports was generally moderate to high, but within-person correspondence was low. Judged change was only weakly related to changes over a week computed from weekly recall or from average momentary reports. Given the importance of within-person change for treatment studies, these results indicate a serious nonequivalence in weekly recall and averaged momentary reports of pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-69
Number of pages9
JournalPain
Volume107
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Keywords

  • Agreement
  • Consistency
  • Diaries
  • Ecological Momentary Assessment
  • Relief

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this